SAR's hope in long term
lies in WTO for China
By Martin Lee
NEXT WEEK, THE United States Congress will once again examine the US
trade relationship with China. The Clinton administration seeks to terminate
the application of the Jackson-Vanik amendment to a 1974 trade law, which
requires the Congress to take an annual vote on whether to continue normal
trade relations (NTR) with China, formerly known as most favoured nation
(MFN) status.
Passage of the bill would mean that China and the US will be entitled
to reciprocal trade benefits upon China's accession to the World Trade
Organisation (WTO) based on the terms and conditions agreed between the
two countries on November 15, 1999.
In the past, my party and I have advocated that the US unconditionally
renew normal trade relations with China. Today, we maintain our stance
that China should be granted permanent NTR with all members of the WTO
and allowed to become a member of the international trade community. By
engaging China in international trade, we increase the chance of China
becoming a rules-abiding member inside the international system. This
represents one of the best long-term hopes for bringing in the rule of
law.
Perhaps more importantly, we see a window of opportunity in jump-starting
the engine in China that will bring about the rule of law and human rights
improvements.
As part of the protocol for accession, China has to meet a host of WTO
rules. In the long run, it should be conducive for China to move away
from arbitrary governmental action, and towards the rule of law, rules-based
accountability, and greater transparency.
Nonetheless, we should caution against unrealistic optimism - believing
that in WTO membership lie answers to all questions or a panacea to all
problems. The road to reform in the right direction will be painful. We
cannot count on the authoritarian government alone to do all the right
things all the time. In times of political crises, real or imagined, it
is bound to recoil back to its instinct for self-preservation through
political control.
This has been made painstakingly clear most recently by its purge of
academics labelled as members of the liberal economic or political wings
and accused of 'Westernisation'. Therefore, to sustain the reforms, we
need the people of China to be the engine for reform, and WTO membership
for China provides the catalyst. Codification and enforcement of principles
of fair trade will raise consciousness among the people of China about
the concept of rights, and instil an appreciation for the sanctity of
contracts. The consolidation of the idea of equality before the law is
the immediate precursor to internalising the rule of law within Chinese
culture.
|