PRESS STATEMENT
2 May 1998
Democrats Accuse DAB of Deliberately Misrepresenting Record
In response to harsh attacks at debates, Democratic Party Chairman Martin
Lee today charged their opponents in the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment
of Hong Kong with deliberately misrepresenting his Legislative Council
record from 1991 and said: "These distortions are clearly in order
to distract voters' attention from the DAB's own embarrassing recent record
in the Provisional Legislature, including their absolute failure to check
the government, their rubber-stamping of bad laws and their damaging erosion
of the rule of law."
In a debate broadcast last Thursday, Gary Cheng Kai-nam, the Democratic
Alliance for the Betterment of Hong Kong's ticket leader on Hong Kong island,
alleged that Martin Lee had wanted to leave no reserves for the SAR. Gary
Cheng said:
"Your party talks about economic issues in your election platform,
but your party chief Martin Lee Chu-ming has said the pre-handover government
ought not to leave even ten cents for the SAR government."
Martin Lee countered:
"This is absolute rubbish. The DAB is deliberately misrepresenting
my remarks during an April 1991 Legislative Council debate. As fully set
out in the Hansard, I moved a motion on autonomy. Mr. Cheng has totally
distorted clause b) of this motion. A close look at the whole motion and
the debate accompanying it (17 April, 1997) reveals my intentions. Indeed,
my speech from the debate on this clause begins:
"I wish to emphasize that this sub-paragraph does not touch upon
the level of reserves that is to be left to the HKSAR Government in 1997;
the sole question it addresses is who is to have control over those reserves
between now and 1997." (Relevant Hansard pages attached).
Full text of the 1991 motion:
"That this Council urges the Government to make public all the
details of any agreement reached with the PRC Government concerning the
proposed Port and Airport Development Strategy; and further, urges the
Government:
a) to protect the high degree of autonomy presently enjoyed by the Hong
Kong Government and which ought to be enjoyed by the SAR Government after
1997 and refuse to allow PRC Government-nominated representative to sit
on any executive or advisory body in Hong Kong, including the Airport Authority;
b) to respect Hong Kong's financial autonomy and not agree to set aside
any portion of Hong Kong's fiscal reserves in trust for the post-1997 SAR
Government, except as specifically provided for the Annex III of the Joint
Declaration in relation to the "Land Fund;
c) to ensure that consultation with the PRC Government does not mean
giving the power of veto to the PRC Government on any matter relating to
the internal affairs of Hong Kong."
* * *
Hong Kong Standard
Democrats, pro-Beijing rivals clash over reserve fund issue
01/05/1998
By Carmen Cheung
TOP Democrats and their pro-Beijing rivals clashed heatedly again yesterday
in a public debate, this time over the reserve fund.
Cheng Kai-nam, of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment of Hong
Kong, accused Democratic Party vice-chairman Yeung Sum of refusing to clarify
an alleged remark made by DP boss Martin Lee Chu-ming that the entire fund
be spent before the handover.
The sharp exchange came during a lively two-hour election forum conducted
by RTHK in Central.
All three are their parties' top candidates in the Hong Kong Island
constituency.
Mr Cheng challenged the Democrats on the fund, saying Mr Lee had suggested
the outgoing British administration should not leave anything for the Special
Administrative Region.
``Your party also talks about economic issues in your election platform,
but your party chief Martin Lee Chu-ming has said the pre-handover government
ought not to leave even 10 cents for the SAR government,'' Mr Cheng said.
Dr Yeung only replied: ``Our party disagrees to abolish the peg.''
Mr Cheng repeated the question and Dr Yeung again gave an indirect answer:
``Our party's position on the reserve fund has been very clear.''
When Mr Cheng tried a third time, Dr Yeung retorted: ``Our party chief
has never said things which are different from the party.''
Mr Lee, a barrister, was absent as he was in court defending radio talk
show host Albert Cheng King-hon.
The exchange came about when Dr Yeung asked the DAB to define its position
on the issue of asking the Central Government to reverse its verdict on
the 4 June 1989 crackdown and on the release of jailed dissidents.
Mr Cheng replied: ``I've said about 1,000 times, history will judge
the incident and we at the DAB felt the Chinese students are righteous
and our party disagreed with the shooting of the students.''
Hitting back, Mr Cheng then asked the Democrats to define their position
on the reserve fund.